Shooting Film on a Tight Budget!

Shooting Film on a Tight Budget!
By Keith Derickson

It is often the case that we come into the world of film photography for very little money, rarely does the expense stop there.  Shooting film opens a whole new realm of must-have purchases.  Whether its darkroom supplies, accessories, or a camera you simply can’t live without, there always seems to be a hole in the film shooter’s pocket.  If you are like me, then you'll want nothing more than to blow your paycheck on film stuff but often financial obligations prevent you from doing so.

Film is a recurring cost that can add up quickly.  As an alternative to fresh dated film, try to get your hands on expired film.  Expired film is often cheaper and as long as it has been stored properly it will perform just as well.  Another option is bulk loading.  Plenty of popular black and white emulsions can be found in bulk 100-foot rolls.  Pick up a bulk loading machine and reusable cartridges and you can save quite a bit on each roll of 35mm film you shoot.  You may also want to consider purchasing rebranded film.  Companies such as Freestyle Photographic Supplies make special arrangements with film manufactures to sell products under different labels that cost much less than their brand named counterparts.  The same can be said about photographic paper and darkroom chemicals.

"Ruby Begonia's" on Kodak T-Max 100 / Pentax K1000 35mm camera

If the majority of your work ends up online instead of on physical prints you can save money at the lab as well.  Film processing by itself should be much less than the price that includes prints so ask the lab for development and scans only.  Better yet, buy a scanner and you can really cut back what you spend at the lab.  The money you save can easily offset the initial cost of the scanner.

When it comes to saving money on purchasing a camera it’s a good idea to be patient.  Next time you visit eBay to look for a new camera try adding the auction to your Watch List instead of bidding right away.  Prices tend to vary quite a bit between auctions and holding out for one with little competition can add up to big savings.  Just be sure to know what you are getting and read the seller’s terms carefully.  If you are dealing with a private individual, such as a Craigslist sale, don’t be afraid to haggle.  There is nothing wrong with making a lower offer as long as it’s fair.  Offending the seller will most likely kill any chance at getting a better deal.  Thrift stores, charity shops, yard sales, garage sales, boot sales, flea markets, or whatever other second-hand options you have in your area are always great places to find film equipment.  These items may be in poor or unknown condition but getting them for next to nothing can make it worth taking a chance.  With a little time and effort you might just turn a “beater” into “a good one!”

"Neighborhood Sunrise" / Canon FTb 35mm camera

Keith Derickson is a long-time Film Photography Podcast listener. When not listening to the FPP, Keith is busy with his wife and two children.  Keith has been shooting film for ten years and considers himself a hobbyist, enjoying the tactile process of shooting film.  He works at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and his New Years resolution is to find a common voice in his photography.
 

All images by Keith Derickson / http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithderickson/

Comments

Rolf Schmolling's picture

Hi,
interesting take on things. Well I feel these constraints quite a bit too. But what counts most I believe is TIME – especially when having to take care of a family (2 kids)… so having a scanner (nothing very special Canon 8600f; Silverfast Ai 6.x) is indeed a possibility to reduce costs (actually keeping them in check). But at times I would love to have much more time to take care of the backlog of negatives to scan. Starting to self-develop in bw will add up to this I'm afraid.

Unfortunately in my experience – I'm living in Germany – the available offers to get film developed or developed&scanned are either cheap and low-quality (which translates as really low density or dpi and not so nice colour; very cheap storage of developed negatives and so on) or definitely not cheap - targeting to professionals. If any reader from Germany suggests an alternative for colour-negative film I'd be delighted.

I have thought about buying bulk-film but for _my_ film, Kodak Tri-X that is just not saving anything. Here in Germany fotoimpex.de (really good store for analog stuff) sells Tri-x (36mm) repackaged for just a bit above 3 €.
There is still so much cheap Agfa stock around that this is not interesting as well in this context.

some different examples scanned by different sources can be found here (shameless self-plug):

my tumblr-blog

keep up the good and intersting work!

Rolf

 

Marius's picture
Its about an Year I shoot with film camera.. I'm not frequent shooter, I don't arrange sessions or go searching for subject. I might say I'm snap-shooter, so I used only 16 rolls of film.. developing is cheap 1,5$, scanning free (using wife's scanner), by adding camera and lens cost(20$) I spent about 150$.. there is no way I could find a digital camera for similar price with similar functionality (full manual) and image quality... also camera's battery should last for one more year... film photography is cheap - at-least for me and I don't see why should a man with photography as a hobby (or less) choose digital camera.
Woods's picture
I guess I'm lucky living in Shanghai, China where some chinese film cost about 1$~2$ / roll and processing can get as cheap as 5$ for development + scan and 1$ for getting the whole thing back by express delivery. However, film is pretty popular here so old cameras can be more expensive than in Europe or in the US. -- Woods (http://www.flickr.com/photos/woodsbarrack/)
Ken Dickinson's picture
Good article, Keith. I know exactly what you mean about the perpetual hole in the film shooter's pocket; when I worked in camera shops I used to say that I worked there to support my habit...er, hobby. I also relate to what you said about holding out for a camera on "the bay" with little competition. I picked up a pair of Pentax Spotmatics that way, as well as a beautiful Pentax S1a for a very good price. I would add that, unless the seller has had the camera serviced recently, investing in a general CLA would be a good idea. After investing in a service treatment to calibrate the shutters and fix the meter on one of the Spotmatics, as well as replacing light seals and lubricants, they are now in tip top shape and probably good for at least another 20 years or so. Definitely worth the investment!
Michael's picture
As to the cost of shooting film - (Ignoring GAS) Over a 10 year span shooting about 8,000 photos a year will cost about the same as digital. A little less if you do your own development. A little more if you shoot slides. I ran the spreadsheet. If you shoot less than 8k/yr, film is cheaper. More than 8k, digital gets cheaper per picture. The numbers were based on hybrid workflow, starting from scratch, 35 mm/full frame, BW or C-41, and flagship cameras from Canon with three L-class zooms and a prime L. Lenses, computers, and software are a wash. Digital bodies vs film/processing are all that is left. It is always good to find alternate sources of film. The last paragraph is probably the most important part of the whole post. Thanks Keith
Luc Moreau's picture
I agree about all of this and already applied it. I should mostly bulk-loaded B/W and expired C-41 cheap film. No attempt to go try other formats, they're more expensive anyway. One of my secrets is I'm using a fixed price photo service available here where they charge 4.5 euro for film processing + prints included, any number of prints. So when I use my half-frame cameras I get 72 pictures (including prints) processed for that price. Not too expensive I think. At least that way my family gets to see my pictures on real paper not just on computer screens. For B/W I develop and scan myself so that's cheap. My tank holds 5 rolls per batch so it's not a huge waste of time. I don't really print much however. I tried sending the scans to be printed by standard photo services but they're not doing a great job, nothing beats the wet darkroom for B/W I think. Getting them printed by the few remaining wet printing services would be rather expensive. I did it myself in the past but I just don't want to rebuild my own darkroom so far. Finding time to print would be the main issue anyway I guess.
jimagesdigital's picture
Well done, Keith!
kderickson's picture

Thanks for all of the great comments and feedback!

Anonymous's picture

it was pretty good and interesting article on "Shooting Film on a Tight Budget" , well done Keith :)

waterproof camera

Igor-P's picture
Yeah, you could bulk load your own film to save a few pennies, or devote an enormous amount of your spare time to scanning slides and negatives... or you could just stop wasting your money collecting cameras you don't need and put that money towards your film and processing costs.
Anonymous's picture
Are these facts true about gaming laptops? good gaming laptops
nicky's picture
Most definitely i’ll are convinced the latter. people pleased with in instances where rrnside a white colored golden, the fact is that Catherine is naughty and F Nicole von Furstenberg shirts or dresses right before nov 2008 election. bare program if your attire of cotton, yarn louis vuitton galliera azur some grilling with charcoal dog pen cover in what is a up to date organza and looking after coloration struggle. getting rid of belly fat

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.